Captain America: The New World Order, released February 12th, has sparked a flurry of critical opinions, ranging from enthusiastic praise to measured disappointment. While many lauded its action sequences, strong performances, and the impressive visual spectacle of the Red Hulk, others criticized the film's shallow storytelling and underdeveloped plot.
Table of Contents
- A New Era for Captain America
- Key Strengths and Weaknesses
- Plot Summary (Spoiler-Free)
- Conclusion
- Positive Aspects
- Negative Aspects
A New Era for Captain America

Following Steve Rogers' passing of the shield in Avengers: Endgame, Sam Wilson's (Anthony Mackie) ascension as Captain America ignited considerable debate. The Falcon and The Winter Soldier addressed this, showcasing Sam's journey from self-doubt to confident acceptance of his new role. The New World Order blends elements from the Steve Rogers trilogy – wartime adventures, espionage, and global intrigue – introducing Joaquin Torres (Danny Ramirez) as Sam's partner. The film opens with a classic Marvel action sequence, but attempts to mold Sam into a Steve Rogers archetype, sometimes resulting in dialogue and demeanor mirroring his predecessor, except during lighter moments with Torres or in cleverly written tense situations. This approach, however, avoids the over-reliance on humor seen in other MCU films.
Key Strengths and Weaknesses

Strengths:
- Action Sequences: The film delivers thrilling fight scenes, especially those featuring the visually stunning Red Hulk.
- Performances: Anthony Mackie brings charisma and physicality to Sam Wilson, while Harrison Ford excels as Secretary Ross, adding depth and complexity.
- Supporting Cast: Danny Ramirez shines as Joaquin Torres, contributing energy and a dynamic presence to the team. The main antagonist will resonate with longtime Marvel fans.
Weaknesses:
- Script Issues: The screenplay suffers from superficial writing, abrupt character arcs, and inconsistencies in Sam's abilities, particularly against the Red Hulk.
- Predictable Plot: Despite a promising setup, the narrative becomes predictable, relying on familiar tropes from previous Captain America films.
- Underdeveloped Characters: Sam Wilson feels less nuanced than Steve Rogers, and the villain is ultimately forgettable.
Plot Summary (Spoiler-Free)

Following the events of Eternals, President Thaddeus Ross (Harrison Ford) faces unprecedented challenges with the colossal, adamantium-covered body of Tiamut disrupting the world order. He enlists Sam Wilson to assemble a new Avengers team to secure resources from this immense threat. An assassination attempt on the President reveals a shadowy villain at play, leading to a globe-trotting adventure filled with espionage and high-stakes action. While the premise is compelling, the execution falters due to questionable scripting choices and questionable character development.
Conclusion

Despite its flaws, Captain America: The New World Order offers a solid spy-action film enjoyable for casual viewers. Strong cinematography, intriguing plot twists, and standout performances offset the weaker script. The film provides a satisfying, if imperfect, entry into the MCU, with a post-credits scene hinting at future developments. Whether Sam Wilson fully embodies the Captain America legacy remains to be seen, but The New World Order serves as a decent, if flawed, addition to the MCU.
Positive Aspects
Many critics praised the film's action sequences, particularly the Red Hulk's involvement. Anthony Mackie's portrayal of Sam Wilson was lauded for its charm and physicality, and Harrison Ford's performance as Secretary Ross added depth. The Red Hulk's CGI was also highlighted. The humor between Mackie and Ramirez provided a welcome contrast to the film's darker tone.
Negative Aspects
The most frequent criticism centered on the weak, superficial script, lacking emotional depth. Many felt the plot was predictable and relied heavily on previous Captain America tropes. Sam Wilson's character development was deemed insufficient, making him seem one-dimensional compared to Steve Rogers. The villain was criticized for being forgettable, and the pacing was considered uneven. While visually impressive, the film falls short in delivering a truly compelling narrative.